"Overall, I was always comfortable using (the LogPad). And I think it's good to know that as soon as you've completed the input of data, it went straight-away to wherever, and it couldn't possibly get lost. And I think that, in particular, is about 100% better than paper."

Elderly female subject
in a Cambridge, UK, rheumatoid arthritis trial

Read more on what people are saying about PHT.

Collecting Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROs):

Comparing the 5 Proven Ways to Acquire Attributed Patient-Reported Data

The Growing ePRO Industry

In 2010 it is estimated that 30% of new global trials will require subjective patient data, ie they will collect patient-reported outcomes as an endpoint. While paper diary collection is the default method for many latent-adopters of new technologies, electronic capture of patient-reported outcomes is growing steadily as sponsors realize the revenue advantages of more accurate, attributable patient-reported data.

PHT Corporation was one of the first organizations to specialize in collecting and reporting patient-reported outcomes electronically. Since 1994 the PHT ePRO System has become the market's ePRO system of choice, used in 400+ clinical trials. Unlike other ePRO providers, PHT is dedicated to ePRO as its core competency.

The Process of Collecting Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes

Recommendations for collecting PRO measures have been set forth by the myriad guidelines and regulations, and include:

  • Endpoint models clearly associated with the intended claims
  • PRO measures that are valid, reliable and sensitive to change
  • A well defined conceptual framework of the PRO instrument,
  • Evidence that PRO data collection was completed at protocol-specified time

As a result of these guidances, the process of collecting electronic patient-reported outcomes requires much more than a collection device, database, and a diary or questionnaire! Since 1994, the PHT ePRO System has included these distinct yet interoperating functions based on ISO 9001: 2008 quality standards:

The Five Reliable Collection Methods and Devices Used to Collect ePRO

While the flurry of new patient-owned mobile devices may seem adaptive to ePRO collection and perhaps practical, using the patient's own technologies to capture ePRO can be risky for many reasons including

  • Psychometric validity of multiple types of devices, and
  • Data security and compliance with regulatory guidelines.
...using the patient's own technologies to capture ePRO can be risky for many reasons...

Each ePRO collection method and device must be thoroughly vetted in order to comply with various FDA, EMA and country regulations and requirements for clean, attributable data. As a result, there are currently five proven and tested ePRO technologies used by sponsors today (listed alphabetically):

  1. Hand Held Device: Electronic data capture on a mobile device with a central system that allows for web review;
  2. IVR (Interactive Voice Response): Keypad or voice data capture with a central system that allows for web review by site and sponsor;
  3. Internet Web data capture with a central system that allows for web review by site and sponsor;
  4. Pen: Digital pen that captures data and uploads to a central system that allows for web review; and
  5. Tablet: Electronic data capture on a tablet mobile device with a central system that allows for web review.

Download the review of each collection option here.

Contact Us Products & Solutions Experience PHT Why ePRO? Resources Company Sitemap
® 2010 PHT Corporation